Receive updates from The Psychology Notes Headquarters for free, starting right now.
We can deliver them by email, via your phone or you can read them from a personalised news page on follow.it.
This way you won't miss any new article from The Psychology Notes Headquarters. Unsubscribe at any time.
Site title: The Psychology Notes Headquarters - Psychology notes, psychology study guide, psychology tutorials, and other online resources for college psychology students...
Is this your feed? Claim it!
Picture a researcher who wants to study test anxiety across a university of 15,000 students. She cannot test everyone, so she has to pick a smaller group that still represents the whole population fairly. That single decision, how she picks her participants, will shape whether her results mean anything at all. This is where the types of sampling methods in...
The post ...
Most people like to think they’d never quietly go along with cruelty. Yet history and everyday life keep showing the opposite. Psychologist Albert Bandura’s moral disengagement theory explains this uncomfortable pattern: how ordinary, otherwise decent people carry out or ignore harmful acts without feeling the guilt you’d expect. The theory doesn’t argue these people lack a c...
A test can give you the exact same score every single time and still be measuring the wrong thing entirely. That’s the core tension between reliability and validity in psychology: reliability asks whether a measurement is consistent, while validity asks whether it’s actually accurate. A bathroom scale that reads five pounds heavy every time is perfectly reliable — it’s just.....
A null hypothesis is the default claim that nothing interesting is happening: no difference between groups, no relationship between variables, no effect of a treatment. Researchers do not set out to prove it. They set it up specifically so their data can argue against it. Working through actual null hypothesis examples from published psychology research makes this logic click...
Self handicapping psychology explains why people sometimes create their own obstacles before a big test, presentation, or performance, using those obstacles as a built-in excuse if things go wrong. It sounds counterproductive, and it is, but it also protects something people value even more than success: their sense of competence. Instead of risking a clear verdict on their a...