Please turn JavaScript on
Homepage
TrendingMy newsFind FeedsDelivery settingsPlansMy earnings
HelpBlog
Log in
Find more feeds
header-image

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

Want to stay in touch with the latest updates from Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective? That's easy! Just subscribe clicking the Follow button below, choose topics or keywords for filtering if you want to, and we send the news to your inbox, to your phone via push notifications or we put them on your personal page here on follow.it.

Reading your RSS feed has never been easier!

Website title: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective - Exploring Knowledge as a Social Phenomenon

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0.4 / day

Message History

Truths Beyond Our Ken: Responding to McCraw, Peter Baumann
I am very grateful to Benjamin McCraw for his recent contribution and continuation of our discussion of the “Reidian Transcendental Argument” (RTA) (see McCraw 2026). I think that McCraw is bringing up a new and very important point: one about...

Read full story
Beyond Representation: Systemic Epistemic Alterity and the Architecture of Knowledge in the Contemporary Academy, Pa...
3. Productive Intersections Between Systemic Epistemic Alterity and Other Traditions in the Study of Knowledge and Power Placing Systemic Epistemic Alterity in dialogue with major traditions in the study of knowledge and power clarifies a central claim: the production of...

Read full story
Beyond Representation: Systemic Epistemic Alterity and the Architecture of Knowledge in the Contemporary Academy, Pa...
Abstract This article advances Systemic Epistemic Alterity as a critical analytical framework rather than a comprehensive empirical model. It does not claim to exhaustively explain all forms of epistemic exclusion, nor to replace existing theories of epistemic injustice, postcolonial critique,...

Read full story
Intellectual Vices: Perhaps More is More? A Reply to Matheson, Francesca Pongiglione
Abstract Jonathan Matheson’s critique (2025) of my paper “Epistemic Hubris” (2025) hinges on the claim that the vice I describe is not novel, but rather a variation of familiar epistemic vices—namely, intellectual arrogance and hyper-autonomy. In what follows, I will...

Read full story
No Such Thing as Reliable Bullshit Machines: A Reply to Hauswald, Moti Mizrahi
Abstract In Mizrahi (2025a), I sketch two arguments against the claim that LLMs should be granted the status of epistemic authorities worthy of epistemic respect. Rico Hauswald (2026) objects to the second premise (2, II) of each of these arguments...

Read full story