Please turn JavaScript on
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective icon

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

Want to stay in touch with the latest updates from Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective? That's easy! Just subscribe clicking the Follow button below, choose topics or keywords for filtering if you want to, and we send the news to your inbox, to your phone via push notifications or we put them on your personal page here on follow.it.

Reading your RSS feed has never been easier!

Website title: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective - Exploring Knowledge as a Social Phenomenon

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0.34 / day

Message History

Volume 15, Issue 5, 1–68, May 2026 ❧ Breidenstein Jr, Joseph I. 2026. “A Response to West’s ‘Usable Antiquity’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 15 (5): 1–8. ❧ Galli, Leonardo González. 2026. “A Commentary on Edelsztein and Cormick’s ‘If...

Read full story
Tomas Nemunas Mickevičius’s fascinating “Gilbert Simondon as a Philosopher of (Technological) Mediation” (2024) builds on Pascal Chabot’s observation that Simondon is “the philosopher of technical mediation. For him, it is central” (338). Mickevičius then systematises the dimensions of mediation into...

Read full story
Abstract This reply to Aleksandra Vučković clarifies two aspects of my earlier critique of Pre-emptionism and develops a positive alternative account of epistemic authority. It argues that evidentialist approaches may adequately capture epistemic permissions but fail to explain the positive...

Read full story
Again, I want to begin by thanking Peter Baumann for the continued dialogue and thought devoted to my work. In this quick reply (rejoinder?), I want to select a few of the most salient points in Baumann’s most recent exchange...

Read full story
Scylla fascistiscientia and Charybdis blandipensamentum could very well be the names of the species of legendary epistemological monsters that Valeria Edelsztein and Claudio Cormick are trying to fight in their indeed very appealing article (2026). The precise individuals of those...

Read full story