Please turn JavaScript on
Homepage
TrendingMy newsFind FeedsDelivery settingsPlansMy earnings
HelpBlog
Log in
Find more feeds
header-image

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

Want to stay in touch with the latest updates from Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective? That's easy! Just subscribe clicking the Follow button below, choose topics or keywords for filtering if you want to, and we send the news to your inbox, to your phone via push notifications or we put them on your personal page here on follow.it.

Reading your RSS feed has never been easier!

Website title: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective - Exploring Knowledge as a Social Phenomenon

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0.39 / day

Message History

If It’s Too Good to be True, It Ain’t: On Feminist Epistemology and a Historical Myth, Part II, Valeria Edelsztein a...

Section 4: … And Its Philosophical Uptake According to Natalie Ashton and Robin McKenna (2018), it is: [N]ow accepted that the peak in sexual activity during ovulation is explained by female rhesus monkeys initiating sex, but for a long time...


Read full story
If It’s Too Good to be True, It Ain’t: On Feminist Epistemology and a Historical Myth, Valeria Edelsztein and Claudi...

According to an account popularized by Kim Wallen (and, more importantly, according to the appropriation of this story by feminist epistemologists), it was only since 1976 (via the introduction of the concept of “proceptivity”, which contrasted with that of “receptivity”)...


Read full story
On Reasonable Cooperation and Vaccine Hesitancy Among Ethnically Marginalized Communities: A Reply to Kelsall and So...

In “Two Kinds of Vaccine Hesitancy”, Joshua Kelsall and Tom Sorell (2025) consider whether it is reasonable to be vaccine hesitant. The paper discusses a number of key issues such as: (i) open questions about representativeness in vaccine trials; (ii)...


Read full story
Will the Anti-Skeptic Ever Go Away? A Continuing Dialogue with Baumann, Benjamin W. McCraw

I want to extend an additional and deeper thanks to Peter Baumann for the continued dialogue stemming from my paper. Baumann’s charitable, yet critical, continued discussion models what is best in the philosophical tradition. I hope my few thoughts in...


Read full story
Why Shouldn’t There be Reliable "Bullshit Machines”? A Response to Mizrahi on Artificial Epistemic Authorities, Rico...

In a recent contribution to SERRC, Moti Mizrahi criticizes current attempts to make conceptual space for the idea of artificial epistemic authorities (AEAs), that is, large language models (LLMs) or other AI systems functioning as epistemic authorities (Mizrahi 2025). In...


Read full story