I am a mathematics student, and I have been struggling with a particular way of studying that is becoming quite painful, both mathematically and personally.

Very often, when I study a course in the ordinary way, I can learn the definitions, follow the proofs, and eventually solve the exercises, but I still have the feeling that I do not really understand what is going on. I then start asking questions that are not necessary for the course: why a particular definition is the natural one, whether it can be reconstructed from more geometric ideas, how it arose historically, whether two apparently different constructions are manifestations of the same thing, etc.

Sometimes following these questions for several hours or days has a remarkable effect: when I return to the original material, the formalism that previously felt arbitrary becomes almost obvious because it has aligned with an intuition I have constructed.

The problem is that this way of studying is extremely expensive in time. A course cannot wait for me to resolve every conceptual difficulty to my satisfaction. There is always another chapter and another exam. So while I am pursuing one of these questions, I often have a persistent thought in the background that I should stop and study more conventionally.

Conversely, when I do study conventionally and deliberately accept a level of understanding sufficient for the course, I experience a different kind of anxiety: I worry that I am repeatedly abandoning precisely the questions through which I might develop mathematically. “I will come back to this later” often seems unrealistic, since there will always be more required mathematics to learn.

There is also a more personal aspect of this which has become increasingly painful for me: isolation.

The parts of mathematics that I value most are often precisely the parts that are not examined, required, or even discussed in the course. This can produce the strange feeling that I share the official mathematical activity with the people around me, while the mathematical activity that feels most important to me remains almost entirely private.

Sometimes this becomes more than ordinary loneliness. I feel difficult to understand. It is not necessarily that I need other people to agree with my way of studying, but I would like to have people with whom these questions feel important enough to spend time on, rather than something one should quickly put aside in order to return to the syllabus.

I want to emphasize that I am not claiming that other students understand mathematics superficially, or that my approach is somehow superior. For all I know, part of the problem may simply be that I find it unusually difficult to feel satisfied by standard presentations. Indeed, sometimes I wonder whether I could understand the material perfectly well by putting more effort into the ordinary route, and whether my tendency to go off in a completely different direction is partly a preference rather than a necessity.

But this creates an uncomfortable situation. Going deeply into these questions can make me feel isolated from the normal rhythm of university mathematics; suppressing them can make me feel as though the part of my mathematical life that matters most to me has nowhere to exist. At its worst, there is a feeling of being somehow incomprehensible: the things occupying so much of my inner mathematical life seem largely invisible from the outside.

Ambition can make this considerably worse. It is tempting to justify spending so much time on these questions by thinking that perhaps this is how one eventually becomes a very good or original mathematician. But then every decision to study efficiently starts to feel like a missed opportunity, while every deep investigation becomes burdened with the expectation that it should eventually lead to something important. The exploration stops being innocent.

This has made studying itself surprisingly painful at times. If I follow a question, I become anxious about how much time I am losing and how far I am drifting from what I am supposed to be studying. If I suppress it and work efficiently, I can feel that I am abandoning something important to me. And if I pursue these questions alone for long periods, the sense that this part of my mathematical life is not shared can itself become painful.

I am therefore particularly interested in the experience of professional mathematicians who recognize some part of this description.

How did you learn to distinguish between a conceptual difficulty worth pursuing very deeply and one that you should temporarily accept and move past? Did you deliberately protect time for investigations that were not required for exams or immediate research? Did you eventually find other people with whom this kind of mathematical exploration could be shared? And did becoming more mathematically mature make the conflict easier, or is learning to live with incomplete understanding simply part of doing mathematics?

I am not primarily looking for advice about passing exams more efficiently. I am trying to understand how one can preserve an exploratory mathematical life without letting it prevent ordinary academic progress, without turning it into a test of one's intelligence or future potential, and without feeling so isolated while doing it.

Recent Questions - MathOverflow

Message History

Delivery option(s)