Please turn JavaScript on
header-image

Patently-O

Get updates from Patently-O via email, on your phone or read them on follow.it on your own custom news page.

You can filter the news from Patently-O that get delivered to you using tags or topics or you can opt for all of them. Unsubscription is also very simple.

See the latest news from Patently-O below.

Site title: Patently-O, the nation's leading patent law blog

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0.8 / day

Message History

by Dennis Crouch

For the past year, the Federal Circuit has been systematically tightening the screws on patent damages and particularly pro-patentee expert testimony on the issue. Beginning with EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC, 137 F.4th 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2025), the court vacated a $20 million reasonable royalty award for insufficient apportionment. Then came <...


Read full story

by Dennis Crouch

Oral argument at the Federal Circuit typically lasts 30 minutes. But the judges on the panel do not divide that time equally among themselves.  I used a sample of 1000+ Federal Circuit oral arguments and found some big differences among the judges. 


Read full story

The Supreme Court will shortly decide whether to grant cert in Lynk Labs. At the suggestion of a reader, I wanted to make these posts about the case available to non-subscribers seeking to research the issues.

Dennis Crouch, Prior Art Document vs. Prior Art Process: How Lynk Labs Exposes a Fundamental Ambiguity in Patent Law, Patently-O (July 9, 2025), ...


Read full story

by Dennis Crouch

In Apple v. Squires, the Federal Circuit has again reinforced the USPTO Director's broad and largely unchecked discretionary power at the IPR institution stage. Over the past several years, the court has systemati...


Read full story

by Dennis Crouch

The Federal Circuit has affirmed an $84.9 million antitrust patent-misuse judgment against a patent owner who conditioned licenses on exclusive purchase of unpatented products, finding that the products were "staple goods" with substantial non-infringing uses and therefore outside the Congressionally created safe harbor 35 U.S.C. § 271(d).


Read full story