On Tuesday, United States-based pharmaceutical company Pfizer and BioNTech, its German partner, announced that they started a clinical trial of the latest version of their Coronavirus vaccines specifically intended to protect against the highly infectious Omicron variant the COVID-19. In a joint statement, both companies stated that they would test the new vaccine as both primary and booster doses in over fourteen hundred healthy adult American volunteers between eighteen and fifty-five.

Pfizer announced to start a clinical trial of the latest version of their vaccine, mainly designed combat Coronavirus Omicron variant. Drug companies will test the new vaccine as both initial and an additional shot in over fourteen hundred healthy adult volunteers from 18 to 55. pic.twitter.com/uRfa7n0zxA

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 26, 2022

Vaccine researchers will separate the volunteers into three groups. The first volunteer group, which received the primary two shots of the current vaccine, will receive one or two shots of the new Omicron-specified vaccine. Furthermore, the second group, who received the first two shots, including a booster of the original, will receive one shot of either the current type or the revised version, while the third group of volunteers will be consist of unvaccinated adults who will be vaccinated with three shots of the Omicron-specified vaccine.

The clinical trial of the Omicron-specified Pfizer vaccine comes amid the release of a new study that suggests antibodies produced by an additional shot of the original dose still provide robust protection four months after the final dose. Moreover, the results were posted online Saturday and still not published peer-reviewed in an official scientific journal.

Use of two Antibody Treatments Halted

In an associated matter, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced Monday that it is stopping using two COVID-19 antibody treatments because of their incompetence against the new variant. The national drug agency said it would limit the emergency use authorization (EUA) granted in connection with Eli Lilly and Regeneron’s treatments.

The decision to pull the two Pfizer Unveils Omicron-specific Coronavirus vaccine trial treatments leaves hospitals, health advisers, and doctors in the U.S. with only one antibody treatment of American drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology, its partner, along with antiviral pills of Pfizer and Merck – all of which are in short supply all over the country and very difficult to find.

Omicron Variant New Strain

Scientists across the world are keeping a vigilant eye on a new strain of the highly transmissible Omicron variant of the COVID-19 that has now been detected in over forty countries. The new strain, BA.2, identified in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Sweden, India, the United States, Norway, and Denmark. In addition, Denmark health officials say that the BA.2 version displaced the original version of the Omicron variant, named BA.1, and now accounts for around half of all new cases in the U.S.

According to genomic testing information of the Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID), the online database Outbreak.info says BA.2 detected in forty-nine countries. Additionally, researchers nicknamed it a stealth Omicron because its genetic characteristics make it tougher to detect through PCR tests. Thus far, there are not enough statistics to find out if the new version is more infectious and more lethal than its highly-infectious parent.

Read Also: Booster Vaccine Shots Needed Against Omicron – CDC Study

The post Pfizer Unveils Omicron-specific Coronavirus Vaccine Trial appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Tuesday, Secretary-General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg told Christiane Amanpour of CNN that NATO would send a written proposal to Russia later this week in an effort to find a way forward amid mounting tensions over the troops’ build-up of Russia on the border of Ukraine. Stoltenberg said they would highlight that they agree to discuss transparency on military activities, arms control, risk reduction mechanisms, demilitarization, and others relevant to European security.

NATO Secretary-General states that the alliance will send a written proposal to Russia in an effort to find a way ahead amid rising fears over the Russian military troop buildup on the Ukrainian border. The written proposal will outline talks on arms control pic.twitter.com/LPyecqAx8x

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 26, 2022

Last week, the chief civil servant of NATO said that the Western military coalition would soon send its written proposals to Moscow, responding to the security demands of Moscow and suggesting critical discussions on the measure of transparency on military activities, arms control, and missile deployments. His remarks came one day after the North Atlantic Treaty Organization announced that some member nations were putting forces on standby and sending more fighter jets and ships to Eastern Europe.

Furthermore, the moves signified growing concerns of a potential attack of Ukraine, following some months of military strategy by Moscow that set off retaliatory series of escalations with allied forces. Stoltenberg said there is still a diplomatic approach to the Ukraine-Russia crisis. Still, it requires that Russia de-escalates its power approach and settles to engage in political dialogs with NATO and its allies in good faith.

The Kremlin Denied the Allegations to Attack Ukraine

Since last year, Moscow deployed around 100000 troops on its border with Ukraine and is sending forces into neighboring Belarus for joint military exercises in February that Ukrainian officials raised concerns that it could be severe as a full-fledged theater of operations from which to launch an attack. But Russia repeatedly denied the accusations about its plans to attack Ukraine. However, it argued that NATO support for the nation fuels a mounting threat on the western border of Russia.

The NATO chief told CNN that NATO would not deploy fighting troops to Ukraine. Still, it needs to be sure that there is no misinterpretation about NATO’s commitment to defend all allies and readiness, especially in the eastern part of the coalition. Further, he explained that NATO increased its presence in the eastern region of the alliance, Baltic regions, and in the Black Sea because of these reasons.

NATO counties Deployments to Eastern Europe

In a Monday statement, NATO said that member countries announced several deployments to Eastern Europe in recent days. These member states include:

• Denmark to send four F-16 fighter aircraft to Lithuania and a warship to the Baltic Sea
• The Netherlands to deploy two F-35 fighter jets to Bulgaria
• France considering sending troops to Romania
• The United States to increase its military presence in the East

The statement doesn’t clarify assisting Ukraine with military support, which is not a NATO member. The NATO chief also said that the organization was considering whether to increase its presence further with battlegroups or enhanced forward presence in the southeast of the NATO. He added that stable deterrence is the key to preventing any invasion of any NATO member and the best way to avoid a conflict.

Earlier this month, High-level dialogs between Russia and the Best wrapped without any breakthroughs, leaving chances of de-escalation and future diplomacy in doubt., NATO allies and the United States hoped the discussions could steer Russia to pursue a path of diplomacy and de-escalation.

On the other hand, Russian officials were angered over NATO and the U.S. refusal to entertain a controversial list of security demands. Russian demands include a ban on Ukraine entering the NATO alliance and that the organization rolls back its expansion in Eastern Europe. In addition, the United States and NATO allies frequently said such proposals from Russia are non-starters.

Read Also: NATO Allies Put Troops on High Alert Amid Russia likely Invasion

The post NATO Prepares to Send Written Proposal to the Kremlin appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Monday, NATO announced that some member nations are putting forces on high alert and sending extra ships and fighter planes to Eastern Europe as the United States and the United Kingdom ordered families of diplomats to withdraw from Ukraine amid probable Russian invasion. The development underscores mounting concerns of likely Russian aggression, following several months of military planning by Moscow that set off a retaliatory series of escalations with NATO, a military alliance of Western countries.

Russia deployed around 100000 troops as well as war equipment near its border with Ukraine and is also sending military personnel into neighboring Belarus for joint exercises next month that Ukrainian officials concerned could serve as a developed theater of operations from which to launch an invasion. However, United States intelligence officials said they do not know whether Vladimir Putin, the Russian President decided to attack Ukraine.

The US ordered eighty-five hundred military troops on high alert to deploy to Europe as part of a NATO response force amid mounting concerns that Russia may invade Ukraine and put NATO forces on heightened alert, signifying hope that Russia will back away from its position. pic.twitter.com/L20g91tsso

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 25, 2022

Biden to Deploy 5000 US Troops in Eastern Europe

On the other hand, Russia repeatedly rejected the allegations of planning to attack but argued that NATO support for Ukraine constitutes a mounting threat on the western flank of Russia. According to a senior U.S. defense official after high-level dialogs between Washington and Moscow covered earlier this month without any advances over the tens of thousands of Russian military deployed at the border of Ukraine. Now the Biden government is weighing whether to mass as more as around five thousand American troops to bolster NATO partners in Eastern and the Baltics.

Russia and NATO pointed the finger at each other on Monday for the intensifying tensions. Dmitry Peskov, the spokesperson for Kremlin, said while reoffering to the announcement of NATO that tensions are rising amid the concrete actions taken by NATO and the United States. He added that the informational panic that Russia is witnessing is generously labeled with a huge amount of disinformation, only lies, and fakes.

On Monday, Jens Stoltenberg, the NATO Secretary-General, stated that the coalition forces would continue to take immediate measures to protect and defend all partner countries, including strengthening the eastern part of the Alliance. Further, he added that NATO forces will always respond to any decline of the security environment, including through bolstering the communal defense.

Pentagon Ordered 8500 Troops on Higher Alert

On Monday, the Pentagon ordered eighty-five hundred troops on higher alert to possibly deploy to Europe in an effort to NATO response force amid the mounting concern that Russia could soon invade Ukraine, Joe Biden, the President of the United States, consulted with major European leaders, emphasizing American solidarity with allies there.

Putting the American-based troops on high alert for Europe suggested weakening hope that Vladimir Putin, the Russian President, will back away from what the U.S. president himself said looks like a risk to attack neighboring Ukraine. John Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary, said around eighty-five hundred American-based troops put on alert for likely deployment – not to Ukraine but the NATO region in Eastern Europe as part of allied force meant to signal a united commitment to discourage any broader Putin aggression.

Moscow denies the allegations that it is planning an attack on Ukraine. It says that Western blames are purely a cover for own planned provocations of NATO. The U.S. president sought to maintain a balance between actions intended to deter the Russian President and those that might offer Putin an inaugural to use the huge force he massed at the border of Ukraine.

President Biden held an eighty-minute video call with many European leaders on the Russian military buildup and likely response to an attack. Moreover, the White House said that the leaders stressed their wish for a diplomatic solution to the crisis but also discussed attempts to discourage further aggression from Russia, including efforts to slap severe economic sanctions and massive consequences on Russia-like actions along with to reinforce security on the eastern flank.

Read Also: Russia Rejects British Claims of Efforts to Replace Ukraine President

The post NATO Allies Put Troops on High Alert Amid Russia likely Invasion appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Sunday, Afghan civil society representatives and Taliban delegates met in Norway for daylong talks, focusing on the growing humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan. The acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan, Amir Khan Muttaqi, led the Oslo delegate of the Taliban. Furthermore, the meeting members heard patiently to each other’s thoughts and exchanged views on the present situation in the Taliban-seized country.

A brief Taliban statement said that several Afghan personalities attended the talks with the delegation of Muttaqi but didn’t explain. In addition, the Taliban statement noted that they asserted that Afghanistan is the mutual home of all Afghans and emphasized that all Afghans and stressed that all Afghans need to collaborate for the economic, political, and security prosperity of the country.

Taliban envoys and Afghan society representatives held daylong talks, focusing on extending the deepening humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan. The Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi was leading the Taliban delegate. pic.twitter.com/bOUtMaR11a

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 24, 2022

The meeting started three days of closed-door talks the Scandinavian nation arranged among the governing Islamic group, Afghans from several fields within civil society, and Western government officials. In August, the Taliban took over Afghanistan, and since then, their delegates to Pakistan, China, Turkmenistan, Qatar, Iran, and Russia for bilateral as well international meetings.

Frozen Assets of Afghan Central Banks

Anniken Huitfeldt, the Foreign Minister of Norwegian, emphasized that the visit was not recognition or legalization of the Taliban government. However, leaders of both sides must converse with those who actually govern the nation today. Western countries, including the United States, collectively froze approximately $10 billion assets in the Afghan central banks. After the Taliban seizure, most of them were held in the American Federal Reserve.

In the talks with European and American diplomats in Oslo, Muttaqi expected to renew the demands of his government for the release of the Afghan assets as the country faced an economic collapse and an extraordinary surge in humanitarian crisis. Moreover, the United States special ambassador for Afghanistan, Thomas West, was in the Norwegian capital for the dialogs with the delegation of the Taliban.

Special envoy for Afghan girls, women & human rights, Rina Amiri, officials from the American Department of the Treasury, and the United States Agency for International Development accompanied West. In a series of tweets, West welcomed the recent initiative on Sunday to bring the Taliban and Afghan civil society for talks, saying civil society leaders are the strength of prosperous and healthy communities and economies.

The American envoy tweeted that as the U.S. seeks to address the humanitarian crisis together with partners, allies, and relief organizations, they will continue clear-eyed diplomacy with the Taliban leaders about their concerns and steadfast interest in a stable, inclusive, and rights-respecting Afghanistan. Additionally, the State Department stated that the delegation of West would discuss the formation of a representative possible system, economic crisis and the urgent humanitarian, economic crises, counterterrorism & security concerns, and education for girls and women.

Read Also: Afghanistan People Need Aid but not Taliban – G-20

The post Afghan Civil Society and Taliban Leaders Meet in Norway appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Sunday, the Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergey Lavrov, denied a claim from the United Kingdom that Russia intends to replace the Ukraine government with a pro-Moscow administration and that ex-Ukrainian representative Yevhenity Murayev is a possible nominee. On the other hand, the U.K. Foreign Office named many other Ukrainian politicians on Saturday that had links with intelligence services of Russia, along with Murayev, the leader of a small political party with no seats in parliament.

Those lawmakers include former prime minister Mykola Azarov under Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych ousted in 2014 unrest and former chief of staff. The Foreign Office said that some of these politicians have contact with Russian intelligence officers currently involved in preparation for an attack on Ukraine. Murayev told the Associated Press through Skype that the U.K. claim looks funny and ridiculous and that he denied entry to Russia since 2018 on the grounds of a threat to Russian security.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov rejected the United Kingdom claim that Russia plans to replace the Ukrainian administration with a pro-Moscow government and that former Ukraine’s representative Yevheniy Murayev is the most probable candidate. pic.twitter.com/44yUqgYmhE

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 24, 2022

Further, he said that economic sanctions were imposed following a dispute with Viktor Medvedchuk, the most notable pro-Russian Ukrainian politician and a friend of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Nashi party of Murayev – whose name reiterates the former Russian youth movement that supported the Russian president – regarded as sympathetic to Russia, but representative Murayev emphasized characterizing it as pro-Russia.

Ukraine with Neutral Status

In a Facebook post, he said that the time of pro-Russian and pro-Western Ukrainian lawmakers was gone forever. Murayev told the Associated Press that everything that doesn’t back the pro-Western Ukrainian development path is pro-Russia. In addition, he said that he supports Ukraine with neutral status and believes that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is indistinguishable from continuing the war.

Russia-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces have been fighting in the east of Ukraine since 2014, a dispute that killed over fourteen thousand individuals. Volodymyr Fesenko, the Ukrainian political analyst, described Murayev as the most prominent personality in the pro-Russia Ukrainian camp. He added that Murayev is a second choice. Further, he adds that Murayev has no direct connections in the Kremlin.

The British government’s claim was based on intelligence information without offering evidence to back it up. The advancement came amid high tensions between Russia and the West over Moscow’s designs on Ukraine and escalating allegations from both sides that the other is planning aggravations. Maria Zakharova, the spokeswoman of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said Sunday that the misinformation from the Foreign Office of the U.K. is more evidence that it is the NATO nations, headed by the Anglo-Saxons, who are intensifying tensions across Ukraine.

Zakharova states that they call on the U.K. Foreign Office to stop provoking activities and stop spending nonsense. Liz Truss, the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom, said the info shed light on the extent of Russian activity designed to undermine Ukraine and is an understanding into Kremlin thinking. Moreover, the United Kingdom sent anti-tank weapons to Ukraine as part of efforts to strengthen the defense level of the country against a possible Russian attack.

The U.S. Campaign to Unify its European Allies

In recent months, the United States has sped up its aggressive campaign to unify its European partners against the latest Russian invasion of Ukraine. Furthermore, the White House called the British government evaluation deeply concerning and said that it stands with the appropriately elected allies in Ukraine, Emily Horne, the spokeswoman of the National Security Council, said.

The recent assessment came as the United States President Joe Biden visited the presidential retreat Camp David outside of Washington, nestling with his senior federal security team about the situation of Ukraine. Additionally, a White House official said that the talks included attempts to normalize the situation with deterrence measures and diplomacy with the help of partners and allies.

The U.S. will also provide security assistance to Ukraine. On Sunday, the United States State Department ordered the American personnel families at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine to leave the country immediately amid escalated concerns of a Russian incursion.

Read Also: Russia and US Hold Frank Dialogs on Ukraine Issue

The post Russia Rejects British Claims of Efforts to Replace Ukraine President appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Friday, three recent studies suggested more evidence that Coronavirus vaccines stand up to the highly contagious Omicron variant, at least among individuals who received booster vaccine doses. In addition, health officials said they are the first large U.S. studies to look at vaccine protection against the deadly variant. The documents reiterate previous research – including studies in the United Kingdom, Germany, and South Africa – signifying available COVID-19 vaccines are less effective against the highly infectious Omicron variant than earlier variants of the COVID-19, but also that booster doses significantly improve protection.

Friday released three studies from the U.S. CDC offered more evidence that Coronavirus vaccines are standing up to the highly contagious Omicron variant, especially among individuals who received vaccine booster doses. pic.twitter.com/nThZxeYM6z

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 22, 2022

The preliminary study looked at ten states’ emergency room, hospitalizations, and urgent care center visits from August to January. It found the effectiveness of the vaccine was best after three shots of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines in preventing Coronavirus-related urgent care visits and emergency department. However, protection against the virus plummeted from ninety-four percent during the Delta variant wave to eighty-two percent during the Omicron wave. Furthermore, protection from only two shots was lower, especially six months after the second shot.

The Second and Third Study

The second study on Coronavirus focused on case and death rates in twenty-five states from the starting of April through Christmas. Again, individuals who received booster shots had the highest protection against COVID-19 infection, both during the time was dominant and when the Omicron variant was taking over. In addition, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published both articles online.

On the other hand, the Journal of the American Medical Association published the 3rd study, also led by CDC researchers. It looked at individuals who tested positive for Coronavirus from 10th December to 1st January at over forty-six hundred testing sites all over the United States. Three doses of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were around sixty-seven percent effective against Omicron-related symptomatic illness compared with unvaccinated individuals.

Omicron Spike Tests Coronavirus Prevention Efforts at Immigration Facilities

The instantly spreading Omicron variant is testing the ability of the United States authorities to keep a large number of migrants healthy at overcrowded detention centers, where Coronavirus prevention moves were virtually absent at the starting of the outbreak but since improved.

According to ICE statistics, over twenty-five hundred individuals tested positive for Coronavirus Friday in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) one hundred and ninety-eight immigration detention centers countrywide. It states an increase of over seven hundred and ninety-two percent from two hundred and eighty-five cases reported on 3rd January. Moreover, the hike in cases amid a countrywide surge in new cases because of the highly transmissible Omicron variant.

Read Also: US Supreme Court Blocks Federal COVID Vaccine Mandate for Businesses

The post Booster Vaccine Shots Needed Against Omicron – CDC Study appeared first on LivenewsNow.

The foreign minister of the United States, Antony Blinken, and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov held what they held frank discussions to try to cut the chance of a broader dispute in Ukraine. Lavrov repeated denials that a significant number of forces assembled near the border of Ukraine would use to attack Ukraine.

On the other hand, Blinken said that the U.S. would respond harshly to any invasion. Pro-Russian insurgents control large areas of eastern Ukraine since a violent war erupted approximately eight years ago. Around fourteen thousand individuals were killed, and at least two million fled their homes before weak pacts brokered. Furthermore, the United States and its allies jeopardized new economic sanctions if the Russian military took action.

With approximately one hundred thousand Russian troops deployed near Ukraine, Vladimir Putin, the Russian President, issued demands to the West that say concern Russia’s security, including that Ukraine should not join NATO. Moreover, he wants the Western defensive coalition to halt military exercises and stop sending battlefield weapons to eastern Europe, seeing this as a straight threat to the security of threat.

The U.S. Prepared to Persuade Possible Means of Addressing Aggression

Blinken described the talks as frank and substantive, while Lavrov was also frank with a deal to have a good conversation. Lavrov added that he hopes emotions will decrease. Blinken warned the Russian foreign minister of a swift, united, and severe response if Russia attacks Ukraine.

Joined @GMA this morning to discuss the U.S. and international response to Russia’s aggressive actions toward Ukraine. We will continue building a strong, united response from allies and partners to any renewed Russian aggression. https://t.co/IKDtOUJRTY

— Secretary Antony Blinken (@SecBlinken) January 21, 2022

After the dialogs, Blinken said that the United States prepared to follow likely means of handling Russian concerns in the spirit of retaliating. Previously, analysts proposed this might include more clarity on military exercises in the region or restoring sanctions on miles in Europe. Blinken also forced Russia to stop its aggression towards Ukraine, saying the troop build-up at the border gave it the ability to attack Ukraine from north, south, and east.

Permanently Stationed and Newly Arrived Units of Russian Troops

Blinken said that the United States knew from experience that Russia also had a widespread playbook of non-military ways of advancing its interests, including cyber-attacks. Further, he added that America would supply security assistance to Ukraine shortly. Last year, the U.S. sent anti-tank-led missile systems to Ukraine, including ammunition and arms. Blinken said they also discussed Iran and dialogs over its nuclear capabilities, which he called an example of how Russia and the United States can work together on security issues.

On the other hand, Lavrov accused the Ukrainian government of using state terrorism against the rebels in the east and harming the Minsk deals on the dispute there. The foreign minister of Russia said that the United States would send written responses to all proposals of Russia next week. However, Blinken said America hoped to share its ideas and concerns in more detail in writing next week. The conversation between the two ambassadors came one day after Russia revealed plans for naval drills involving over one hundred and forty war vessels and over sixty aircraft, seen as a show of strength.

Read Also: Biden Urged Putin to De-escalate Tensions in Ukraine

The post Russia and US Hold Frank Dialogs on Ukraine Issue appeared first on LivenewsNow.

The House-select Committee probing the United States Capitol riot is demanding Ivanka Trump to voluntarily cooperate with the Committee as lawmakers make their first public effort to organize an interview with former President Donald Trump’s family member. Furthermore, the Committee sent an official letter Thursday requesting a meeting in February with the daughter of the former Republican President, the former White House adviser to her father.

In the letter, the Committee chairperson Representative Bennie Thompson said that Ivanka was in direct contact with the then-president during crucial moments on January 6 insurrection last year, when the Republican president’s supporters attacked the Capitol to stop the congressional certification of the presidential win of Democratic Joe Biden.

The January 6 committee probing the US Capitol riot is demanding Ivanka Trump, daughter of former President Trump, to willingly cooperate with the committee as representatives make their first public effort to organize an interview with the former president family member in Feb. pic.twitter.com/3wMc8xP3ie

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 21, 2022

In addition, the riot followed a rally near the White House where Trump urged his supporters to fight like hell Congress organized to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election. The Committee says that it wants to talk about what Ivanka Trump knew about the efforts of her father, including a phone call they say she witnessed, to pressurize Mike Pence, the former Vice President to refuse those results, along with concerns she might hear from the staff members of Pence, the White House counsel’s office and members of Congress.

White House Staff Requested Ivanka Assistance

Ivanka Trump’s spokesman said that former adviser to Trump just learned that the January 6 Committee issued a public letter asking her to testify before the Committee. The Congressional Committee already knows that Trump’s daughter didn’t speak at the January 6 rally. Moreover, the Committee mentioned testimony that Ivanka pushed her father to suppress the insurgence by his supporters. Investigators wanted to inquire about her actions while the insurgency was in progress.

The Committee chairperson wrote that the testimony reveals that White House staff members requested Ivanka support on several occasions to intervene in an effort to convince former President Trump to handle the underway chaos and violence on the U.S. Capitol Hill. Additionally, the letter is the first attempt of the Committee to ask for details from inside the former president’s family. Previously, the investigators issued summons to the lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Trump’s legal team, other members who filed meritless court challenges to the presidential election that drove the lie that democrats stole the elections from Trump.

The Constitution of the country makes clear that the role of a U.S. vice president is mainly ceremonial in the certification process, and former Vice President Mike Pence stated the congressional session that outlined his decision that a vice president couldn’t claim the autonomous authority to reject the electoral votes of the states. The letter to Trump’s daughter said she was present in the Oval Office and witnessed at least one side of that phone talk. So, the Committee wants to discuss the part of that conversation she observed between the then-president and vice president.

U.S. Supreme Court Allowed Access of January 6 Committee to Trump Documents

The House-select Committee gained victory when the United States Supreme Court allowed it access to the Trump documents, which the former president tried to block the release of White House records. So, the National Archives instantly handed over the hundreds of documents to the nine-member Committee. Those records include speech drafts, presidential diaries, handwritten notes, and visitor logs dealing with January 6 from the files of Meadows.

The investigation of the Committee touched almost every corner of the orbit of the former president in the approximately seven months since it was established, from strategist Steve Bannon to social media platforms such as Meta, Reddit, and Twitter. According to the Committee, it interviewed around four hundred people and issued several subpoenas as it organizes a report set for release before the 2020 elections. So far, the Committee has collected about thirty-five thousand pages of records, including phone records, emails, text messages from people close to the former president.

Read Also: 6th January Panel Sets Contempt Vote for Jeffrey Clark

The post January 6 House Committee Asks Interview with Ivanka Trump appeared first on LivenewsNow.

Volodymyr Zelensky, the President of Ukraine, hit back at the United States President Joe Biden’s remarks about a minor attack by Russia on his country. Biden suggested that a minor attack bring a weaker response from the United States and its partners. Instead, Zelensky tweeted that there are no minor invasions. Just as there are no minor causations and little sorrow from the loss of loved ones.

Russia deployed around one hundred thousand troops near the border but denied planning an attack. Russian President Vladimir Putin made a series of demands to the Western nations, demanding Ukraine should never join NATO and that the defensive coalition halts military activity in eastern Europe.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky responded to United States President Joe Biden’s remarks about a minor invasion by Russia into his country by saying there are no minor incursions.https://t.co/Bj7sMFER9Y pic.twitter.com/UcGNSgMISq

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 21, 2022

Biden told a Wednesday press conference that Putin would pay a high and dear price for attacking Ukraine and suggested that it might hinge on how Russia went about it. He said that Russia would be held accountable if it attacks, and it depends on what it does. His remarks provoked doubts that the United States might respond to Russian violence, and officials are trying to clarify the position of Washington.

Western Strategy over Ukraine Attack

Antony Blinken, the United States Secretary of State was speaking from Germany after meeting European nations’ foreign ministers for dialogs intended at coordinating a Western strategy over a possible attack of Ukraine. The U.S. secretary of state will meet Sergei Lavrov, his Russian counterpart, in Geneva on Friday. Earlier, Moscow warned that the remarks of Biden could further undermine the situation.

What does the Russian President want?

The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, long blamed that the United States broke a guarantee in 1990 that NATO forces wouldn’t expand further east. During the last month’s press conference, Putin protested that they received Russia. Understandings vary over what exactly vowed to Mikhail Gorbachev, the then-Soviet leader. However, the Russian President believes the guarantee was made.

Since then, many eastern and central European nations which used to be part of the Soviet Union or its circle of influence joined NATO. Four of those countries – Estonia, Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania – have borders with Russia. In addition, Russia claims that this expansion, and the presence of NATO forces and military equipment near its borders, is a straight threat to its security.

The nation captured and invaded the Crimean Peninsula in southern Ukraine in 2014 after the country overthrew its pro-Russian president. Since then, the military of Ukraine locked in a war with Russian-supported insurgents in areas of the east near the borders of Russia. Furthermore, there are concerns that the dispute claimed fourteen thousand lives and caused at least two million individuals to flee their homes, may reignite, and that the military of Russia will cross the border.

Read Also: Biden Urged Putin to De-escalate Tensions in Ukraine

The post Ukrainian President Zelensky Hits Back at Biden Comments appeared first on LivenewsNow.

In denial to former Republican President Donald Trump, the United States Supreme Court allows the release of presidential documents to the congressional committee probing the January 6 riot. On Wednesday, the judges refused the Trump bid to withhold the documents from the committee until the conclusion of the matter from the courts.

In addition, the lawyers of the former president hoped to prolong the court battle and keep the documents on hold. However, following the action of the high court, there is no legal hurdle to hand over the documents, which were held by the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). They include speech drafts, presidential diaries, handwritten notes, and visitor logs dealing with the January 6 events from the files of former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows.

On Wednesday, President Joe Biden projected that Russia would invade Ukraine, citing real concerns by Russian President Vladimir Putin, even as he acknowledged discord within NATO over how to respond to a minor invasion. pic.twitter.com/DsaZLe9W73

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 20, 2022

In a statement vowing to reveal all the facts about the insurgency of January 6 and its causes, the chairman of the committee, Representative Bennie Thompson, and vice chairwoman Representative Liz Cheney said that the investigative committee had already started to receive records the former president sought kept secret.

Concerns of Biden White House about Releasing all Documents

Mike Gwin, the spokesman of the White House, called the court’s ruling a crucial step forward for the probe and in ensuring accountability for an exceptional attack on the U.S. democracy and the rule of law. Furthermore, the House committee agreed to postpone its effort to get some documents at the request of President Biden White House. The current administration raised its concerns that releasing all of the documents of the Trump administration wanted by the committee could compromise executive privilege and national security.

Justice Clarence Thomas said that he would grant the request of former President Trump to keep the documents on hold. In addition, the former president’s attorneys asked the high court to reverse rulings by the national appeals court in Washington and prevent the release of the documents even after Biden waived executive privilege over them. In an unspecified opinion, the court acknowledged that there are substantial and serious concerns over whether Trump can win a court order to block the release of certain records from his time in office in a situation like this.

However, the court said that the appeals court found that the former president’s allegation of privilege over the records would fail under any circumstances. The Supreme Court took the matter with the decision of the appeals court that restrained Trump’s interests, advocating that the present president could fundamentally ignore the claims of his predecessor. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote separately in a note to argue that a former president of the country must be able to effectively appeal to the Presidential communications privileges for communications that happened during his presidency, even if the present President doesn’t support the privilege claim.

Read Also: Court Rules Trump Can’t Block Documents Release

The post Supreme Court Allowed Access of Jan 6 Committee to Trump Documents appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Wednesday, President Joe Biden estimated that Russia would invade Ukraine and quoted existential concerns of Russian President Vladimir Putin, even as he admitted dispute within NATO over how to respond to a minor attack. Moreover, the forthright evaluation laid bare the struggle the U.S. president faces in establishing meaningful consequences and sanctions for Moscow, which remains closely tangled economically with the top European partners of the U.S.

The remark provoked near-immediate protest in Kyiv, where representatives met with the top diplomat of the U.S. president as Russian military personnel gathered on the border of the country. High-level efforts to clean up the statement soon followed at the White House. While president Biden pledged to crush economic sanctions on Russia should the Russian President send his troops over the border, including restricting its financial transactions in United States dollars, he suggested Western countries were not in sync on what to do should a minor violation occur.

United States President Joe Biden started his term under the long shadow of the Capitol riot on January 6, an increasingly divided America and a grinding Coronavirus pandemic. The president rounds the one-year mark, but he faces several of those same challenges pic.twitter.com/pbDOTrtlQW

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 19, 2022

The American president told the press at an East Room press conference if it’s a minor invasion from Russian troops, the U.S. ends up having to fight about what to do and not do. However, if they actually do what they are able to do with the forces gathered on the border, it will be a disaster for Russia if they further attack Ukraine. In addition, the president said that he warned the Russian forces to cross the border to kill Ukrainian fighters.

A Reciprocal Response

The White House sought to explain the comments of President Biden by pointing out a Russian invasion through paramilitary forces or in cyberspace would prompt a reciprocal response from NATO forces compared to a scenario where Russian forces move from their positions into Ukraine. U.S. Press Secretary Jen Psaki stated following the president’s marathon press conference, Biden cleared Vladimir Putin that if any Russian military troops invaded Ukraine, that’s a renewed attack, and it will be met with a severe, rapid, and united response from the U.S. and its allies.

Psaki went on by saying that Biden also knows from long experience that the Russian nation has a widespread playbook of violence short of military action, including paramilitary strategies and cyberattacks. Furthermore, he affirmed that those aggressive acts of Russia would be met with a reciprocal, conclusive, and united response. A senior governmental official said if Russian violated Ukrainian sovereignty and military troops tried to take Ukrainian territory by force – whether that was a small or a large part of the land – that would constitute an attack by the standards of the Biden government and would warrant severe consequences.

Russia would Soon Invade Ukraine

Additionally, the officials acknowledge that the United States and NATO members probably will not have the same list of targets and details matching every move; the response would remain highly integrated and provide a force multiplier to their actions. The president’s comments came as the United States entered what officials considered a dangerous duration when an invasion from Russia could occur at any moment. Biden said Wednesday that he believed Putin would soon attack Ukraine.

The prediction of the president about invasion was the definite acknowledgment to date the U.S. completely expects the Russian president to move after deploying around one hundred thousand military troops along the Ukrainian border. American president’s prediction came after Volodymyr Zelensky and the Russian President urged Ukrainians to calm down and not panic over concerns of likely Russian invasion. Everybody needs to exhale. Do not run for emergency supplies such as matches and buckwheat.

Zelensky also urged the media to remain as the media, not become a source of mass panic. He also said that it doesn’t help the enemy pursue hype by reporting daily that war with Russia may happen tomorrow. The Ukrainian president added that the only reason for panic is that this panic still influences the nation after eight years.

Read Also: Russia Prepping Pretext for Ukraine Incursion – White House

The post President Biden Predicts Russia will Invade Ukraine appeared first on LivenewsNow.

Joe Biden, the President of the United States, started his tenure under the long shadow of a devastated Coronavirus pandemic, the January 6 Capitol riot, and an increasingly divided country. As the president rounds the one-year mark of his government, he faces several of those same challenges – all as Biden tries to push through an expensive and sweeping governmental agenda.

The difficulty of the American president of governing through the triple threat of an apparently never-ending outbreak, political polarization from Congress to city halls, and increasing consumer prices all over the country neatly mirrored in the approval ratings of Biden, which hover about forty-five percent. According to the most recent Ipsos poll, since the president took office in the first month of last year, his approval ratings declined with time, with fifty percent of Americans now criticizing his overall performance.

United States President Joe Biden started his term under the long shadow of the Capitol riot on January 6, an increasingly divided America and a grinding Coronavirus pandemic. The president rounds the one-year mark, but he faces several of those same challenges pic.twitter.com/pbDOTrtlQW

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 19, 2022

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said that that comes with the territory. Last month, she said while calling the president that you have every challenge at your feet – laid at your feet, whether it is domestic or global. She revealed those remarks when the president’s voting rights legislation halted in Congress. Additionally, she said that Biden’s government could certainly plan legislation to see if Americans support ice cream and bunny rabbits, but that wouldn’t be very worthwhile to the residents.

The Pandemic and the Economy

The vice president of public polling at Ipsos, Mallory Newall, said that there are two main drivers of this discontent of the Biden administration: the COVID-19 pandemic and the economy. In addition, the U.S. Biden campaigned on a platform of tackling the deadly pandemic and healing the wounded economy. As recently, the inflation in the country hit a thirty-nine-year record high; the economy took the lead.

Newall said that the economy and certainly inflation as part of that started to rise as a significant issue, as per the core political data of Ipsos. The market research and consulting firm see that the primary concern for Americans right now is above both problems. Furthermore, the approval rating for Biden on the economy is underwater, meaning more rejections of the job he is doing than approve. And after that, there was a Coronavirus pandemic, which prolonged throughout the country.

So far, the president tired amid those challenges without success – to pull Democratic slim Congressional majority to support trillions of dollars’ worth of lawmaking that he says is crucial for the United States to keep pace with the rest of the world. It includes a delayed spending plan worth around $2 billion to address everything from elder and childcare to affordable housing, environmental justice, and paid family leave.

Critics and Republicans slammed the president’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, with fundamentalist columnist Jarrett Stepman describing the vaccination mandates of Biden as draconian Coronavirus policies of increasingly uncertain effectiveness, on the website the Daily Signal. Both presidents’ supporters and critics suggested a rest, but Psaki expressed the White House is devoted to its current path.

Read Also: President Biden to Virtually Meet New Japanese Leader on Friday

The post Biden Faces Moderate Approval at Pandemic Year 3 appeared first on LivenewsNow.

Many international airline carriers announced they will suspend flights into the United States starting today amid uncertainty about possible interference between the new 5G smartphone service and critical airplane technologies. Japan Airlines, Air India, Emirates, and All Nippon Airways announced service cut flights citing the issue.

Emirates stated that it would cancel flights into nine United States airports: Dallas, Fort Worth, Miami, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago O’Hare, Seattle, George Bush Intercontinental in Houston, Orlando, and Newark. Further, it added that it would continue flying into Washington Dulles, New York’s John F. Kennedy airport, and the Los Angeles airport.

International airlines like Japan Airlines, Air India, All Nippon, and Emirates announced to cancel flights into the United States starting 19 January amid uncertainty regarding interference between the latest 5G smartphone service after its launch. pic.twitter.com/2bhb6toJBb

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 19, 2022

Emirates said in the statement that they are closely working with airplanes makers and the concerned authorities to lessen operational concerns, and they hope to resume their American services as early as possible. On the other hand, Air India said it would postpone service between San Francisco, JFK, Chicago, and Delhi airport. Additionally, it will postpone a Mumbai to Newark flight.

Both Japan Airlines and ANA said they withdrew some flights to the United States scheduled to use Boeing 777 aircraft but will operate some U.S. flights using Boeing 787s instead. Likewise, Delta Air Lines announced their plans for the possibility of weather-related postponement as soon as Wednesday amid the latest 5G service in the neighborhood of several American airports.

Telecom Enterprises Agreed to Limit New 5G Scope Deployment

Delta Airlines stated that Telecom enterprises agreed to limit the scope of today’s planned 5G deployment and will postpone launching across some specific United States airports. So, this is a positive development toward blocking widespread disruptions to flight operations. However, some flight restrictions may remain.

Transportation officials had already been concerned that the 5G version that was scheduled to be switched on in the first month of 2022 could interfere with some airplane instruments, and several aviation authority groups shared those concerns – despite guarantees from national wireless carriers and telecom regulators.

Specifically, the United States Federal Aviation Administration expressed its concerns that 5G antennas near some airports – nor mobile devices of air travelers – could drop readings from some aircraft equipment designed to inform pilots how far they are from the ground. Those systems, such as radar altimeters used during a flight, are crucial equipment. Radar altimeters are different from standard altimeters, which depend on air pressure readings and rely on radio signals to gauge altitude.

In December, the Federal Aviation Administration already moved to issue a critical order prohibiting pilots from using the likely affected altimeters around airports where low-visibility conditions would otherwise need them. In addition, that new rule could keep airplanes from getting to some airports in certain situations because pilots would be unable to land aircrafts using instruments alone.

Verizon and AT&T both announced Tuesday that they would postpone activating 5G on some towers around some airports. The rollout of the wireless technology nearby key airports had scheduled for Wednesday. A spokesman for AT&T said that the failure of the FAA to what approximately forty nations previously did.

Biden Administration Welcomed the Delay

The Biden government praised the delay in the new 5G deployment and said that the deal would avoid likely ravaging destructions to cargo operations, passenger travel, and for the recovery of the economy. Additionally, it will allow over ninety percent of wireless tower deployment to occur as scheduled. However, yesterday, CEOs from ten airlines told the Biden government to push back the already-postponed rollout.

Read Also: Southeast Airlines Apologized for over 2000 Flight Cancellation

The post Int. Airlines Cancel some US Flights over 5G Rollout appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Monday, the Saudi-led alliance fighting in Yemen launched airstrikes on Sana’a, the Yemeni capital. Shortly after, Iranian-backed Houthi rebels launched a deadly done attack in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates. On Twitter, Saudi Arabia’s state-run Al-Ekhbariya tweeted that airstrike started on the Yemeni capital in response to the lethal threat and military necessity.

In a tweet, Al-Ekhbariya said that the violent attack on Abu Dhabi was a hostile act. Further, it added that the Houthi targeting non-combatants in the UAE and the Kingdom are war crimes whose culprits must be held accountable. The attack near the Abu Dhabi international airport killed three civilians and sparked several expositions in Sana’a.

The Joint Forces Command of the Coalition has intercepted a total of (8) bomb-laden drones that were launched towards the Kingdom to deliberately and systematically target civilians and civilian objects.#EKHNews_EN pic.twitter.com/6oyUVmto9c

— AlEkhbariya News (@EKHNews_EN) January 17, 2022

Iranian-backed Houthi Rebels Claimed the Responsibility of Attacks

The UAE’s official news agency WAM said that the drone attack killed two Indians and one Pakistani and left eight injured, including two airport employees. Moreover, the spokesman for Yemen’s Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for the vicious attack, warning the UAE is a dangerous state if its aggressive escalation against Yemen continues.

On Monday, Houthi spokesman Brigadier General Yahya Saree expressed on the Houthi-owned Al Masirah TV channel that they used a large number of drones and five ballistic missiles in operation labeled as Operation Hurricane Yemen to target Abu Dhabi and Dubai airports, several sensitive and important Emirate facilities, as well as sites and the Musaffah oil refinery in Abu Dhabi.

Saree warned citizens, residents of the United Arab Emirates, and foreign companies to stay away from crucial places, saying they are reviving their warning to nations of aggression that they will receive more painful blows. In addition, the Saudi led-alliance airstrikes launched some minutes after the Houthis claimed responsibility. According to Houthi rebels-run media agency, Al-Masirah, the attack killed at least twelve people and injured eleven.

Al-Masirah reported that first responders are looking for survivors under the wreckage of destroyed buildings. Houthi state-run media reported that the Saudi-led alliance launched over twenty-four airstrikes during the last twenty-four hours on several areas in Yemen.

Right to Respond – UAE Officials

In a statement after the drone attack, UAE officials said that they reserved the right to respond. According to state-news agency WAM. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, the Foreign Minister of the UAE said that the drone attacks struck the airport and Abu Dhabi National Oil Company fuel facilities.

Deadly attacks are extremely rare in the United Arab Emirates, long considered an island of stability and peace in a turbulent. However, Houthi rebels claimed to launch several attacks on the UAE in recent years, but Emirates officials denied the allegations.

Read Also: Legislators call Biden’s Yemen policy a ‘historic shift’ in foreign relations

The post Three killed in Iranian-backed Houthi drone attack in Abu Dhabi appeared first on LivenewsNow.

On Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention agency revised its face mask guidance for American nationals to protect against the Coronavirus pandemic. The health agency recommends putting on the most protective masks as Americans can while stopping short of supporting countrywide usage of N95 respirators.

CDC critics accused the agency of confusing and shifting mask guidance amid the outbreak. However, the health agency clarified on its website that individuals could choose respirators like N95s and KN95s, including removing concerns regarding the supply shortages of N95s masks. The CDC added that Americans should wear the most protective mask they can that fits well and that they will wear consistently.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revised its COVID-19 guidance for Americans on wearing face masks to protect against the virus. The federal health agency urged residents to wear the most protective masks that can fit well on faces.https://t.co/0yGakKvyj3 pic.twitter.com/J3QzVWLC0p

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 17, 2022

Currently, the U.S. is leading the world in Coronavirus deaths – approximately more than eight hundred fifty thousand – even as it fights a wave of new cases amid the fast-spreading Omicron COVID-19 variant. Confusing matters is the refusal of some American nationals to get vaccinated. Nevertheless, the U.S. President said that his administration would start shipping five hundred million Coronavirus free tests to Americans later this month.

In addition, the CDC said that it wants to encourage people to wear face masks rather than push them to put on the highest-level face protection. At the same time, the agency said that masks provide the best level of protection. Further, it added that loosely woven cloth products provide the least protection against the virus.

Science of Masking

The Centers for Disease Control clarified that revised recommendations reflect the science of face masking, including what they learned during the last two years since the start of the pandemic. Recently, more Americans have been choosing higher-grade protection amid the rise in cases.

Moreover, the United States records around eighteen hundred deaths and seven hundred eighty thousand new cases daily – the maximum globally – and record levels of hospitalized patients. According to the Reuters analysis, the Omicron-related surge in cases appears to be slowing in areas that were hit first, including states in the South and Northeast. However, in Western states, new infections rose to eighty-nine percent in the last week compared with the previous week.

Last year in May, the CDC announced that fully vaccinated individuals could cover their face with coverings, as Coronavirus cases were then on the decline. However, in July 2021, the CDC said that fully vaccinated individuals should wear face masks in indoor public gatherings in regions where the virus was spreading rapidly. This week, the CDC said that 99.5 percent of American counties are working under face mask recommendations.

Record Sales of N95 Masks after Fauci Recommendations

Some United States N95 manufacturers said that they had record sales of N95 masks after Dr. Anthony Fauci recommended on CNN that Americans get the best quality mask that they can tolerate and that is available to them. N95 face masks that are adequately worn will filter out almost ninety-five percent of particulate matter in the air, avoiding anything greater than 0.3 microns from passing through.

This week, President Biden again surged Americans to wear face masks and noted that around one-third of Americans report they don’t wear a face mask at all. Several GOP-governed states have no mask requirements. On the other hand, some Democratic-leaning states like California reimposed indoor mask mandates.

Read Also: Health Officials let Coronavirus-infected Staff Stay on the Job

The post CDC Urges Americans to Wear Most Protective Masks appeared first on LivenewsNow.

Joe Biden, the President of the United States, will virtually meet new Japanese leader Kishida Fumio on Friday, as the highly contagious Omicron variant of the COVID-19 continues to rise worldwide. On Sunday, the White House said that the online meeting would take place to highlight the strength of the American Japanese alliance.

Both nations aim to deepen ties in the face of the mounting Chinese military and economic influence in the region. Last April, the U.S. President met in person with Japanese then-Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, who reached Washington for dialogs. Moreover, the Liberal Democrats picked Kishida and is purely a Democratic choice.

US President Biden will virtually meet with the newly elected Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio on Friday to strengthen the ties between both countries. Both leaders will be meeting for the first time to discuss the Chinese rising economic and military clout in the region. pic.twitter.com/kxsbnR4x9I

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 17, 2022

Jen Psaki, the White House Press Secretary, expressed that the U.S. President was looking forward to working with the Japanese Prime Minister to advance the shared vision of both countries for an open and free Indo-Pacific and to expand close collaboration on critical matters such as addressing the climate catastrophe, Coronavirus, and uniting on emerging and innovative technologies.

The U.S. and Japan Mutual Vision

Both nations seek to deepen their diplomatic ties further. The meeting between both leaders will highlight the strength of the United States-Japan alliance, which is the cornerstone of security, stability, and peace in the Indo-Pacific and across the world. American president anticipates working with Kishida to advance both nations’ mutual vision for a peaceful Indo-Pacific region.

Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno echoed the view, expecting the two leaders to confirm the importance of a closer U.S.-Japan alliance and cooperation to respond to the global issues, like efforts toward a world without nuclear weapons. During a press conference, Matsuno stated that Japan hopes the first virtual meeting in 2022 between both countries’ leaders will serve as an occasion to demonstrate to the world the unwavering bond under the Japan-United States coalition and take it to a higher level.

The U.S. President and Japanese Prime Minister had a phone call in October. Soon after, Kishida was elected in parliament to lead the country to replace Yoshihide Suga, who resigned after just over a year in office. Kishida was hoping to hold an official two-sided in-person meeting with Biden at an early date, but it apparently became difficult because of the revival of the COVID-19 in both nations amid the highly transmissible Omicron variant.

Read Also: Biden to Pick Rahm as Ambassador to Japan

The post Biden to Virtually Meet New Japanese Leader on Friday appeared first on LivenewsNow.

According to the White House, the United States intelligence officials determined a Russian effort is in progress to create a pretext for its military troops to attack Ukraine further, and Russia has already prepositioned operators to execute a false-flag military operation in eastern Ukraine. On Friday, Jen Psaki, the White House Press Secretary, said that the intelligence outcomes show Russia is also implementing the foundation through a social media falsehood campaign that portrays Ukraine as an invader that has been planning an impending attack against Russian-funded forces in eastern Ukraine.

Psaki accused Russia of previously dispatched workers trained in urban conflict who could use explosives to carry out acts of disruption against their own proxy forces of Russia – blaming the actions on Ukraine – if Vladimir Putin, the Russian President, decides he wants to go ahead with an attack. Psaki said that the Putin government is preparing for a spell in Ukraine that may leave extensive human rights violations and war crimes should international relations fail to meet their objectives.

A United States officials said that Russia is planning a stage of acts of incitement to create a pretext to attack Ukraine. It comes after one week of Russian-U.S. dialogs intended at calming tensions. Ukraine accused Russia of bringing cyber-attacks on official websites. pic.twitter.com/bXoIw4rswZ

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 15, 2022

John Kirby, the spokesperson of the Pentagon, described the intelligence as reliable. The findings of the United States intelligence, which was brought out and shared with American allies before it was made public, evaluate that the Russian troops’ invasion could start between mid-January and mid-February. Ukraine is also monitoring the possible use of Russian propaganda.

Russia was Planning a Possible False Flag Incident

On Friday, Ukrainian media reported that officials believed special services of Russia were planning a likely false flag incident to inflame other disputes. However, the latest information from the United States intelligence revealed a series of dialogs between the United States and Russia and its Western allies in Europe intended to initiate the worsening crisis made small development.

On Thursday, Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser of the White House, said that the American intelligence community had not estimated that Russians, who previously deployed one hundred thousand troops on its border towards Ukraine, absolutely decided to take an armed course of action. The Crimea catastrophe came at a moment when Ukraine was looking to strengthen ties with the West.

Read Also: Biden Urged Putin to De-escalate Tensions in Ukraine

The post Russia Prepping Pretext for Ukraine Incursion – White House appeared first on LivenewsNow.

Joe Biden, the United States President, is eagerly pushing ahead to push individuals to receive Coronavirus vaccine shots after the Supreme Court blocked the federal mandate of sweeping vaccination or regular testing for larger businesses. When hospitals across the country are flooded and a record number of Americans are getting infected with the highly contagious variant, the federal government hopes states and businesses will order their own vaccination or testing requirements.

Some of the business community cheered the defeat of the federal mandate; the president insisted the government effort has not for not anything. Moreover, the Thursday ruling of the court doesn’t stop him from using his voice as a country head to urge employers to do the right thing to protect the health and economy of U.S. nationals. The conservative majority of the court all but struck down the OSHA’s requirement that larger businesses with hundred or more employees require their workers to receive vaccination shots against the COVID-19 or face weekly testing.

How many family members can avail free tests at home?

On the other hand, it did leave in place a jab requirement for health care workers. On Friday, the White House announced that the state website where residents can request their own free Coronavirus tests would start accepting orders next Wednesday. Those COVID-19 tests could motivate some individuals to seek vaccination, and the government is looking to deal with countrywide shortages. The federal government offers only four free tests per home.

In addition, the Supreme Court ruled on 13th January that Occupational Safety and Health Administration appeared to violate its congressional authority to enforce occupational standards. The ruling further said that Coronavirus is a risk that occurs in several workplaces; it is not a professional hazard in most. Finally, last September, the Biden government announced the mandate, complemented by biting criticism from the president for the approximately eighty million adults in the U.S. who had not still received shots.

After the Supreme Court judgment, the president expressed disappointment in a statement with the justices’ decision but said the federal mandates already had their required effect on cutting the number of unvaccinated Americans. Biden added that the unvaccinated number is down to under thirty-five million. However, the Supreme Court left open the option for the United States to pursue more targeted vaccine mandates, and the White House officials said that there were no instant plans to fill a lawsuit against the regulation.

On Friday, Jen Psaki, the Press Secretary for White House, said that it is now up to the individual and state employers to put in place COVID-19 vaccination requirements. However, a public health law expert at Georgetown University, Lawrence Gostin, said that the U.S. is already suffering from a sixty percent vaccination rate, near the bottom of peer countries.

Response of Small and Large Businesses at the Court Announcement

Gostin said that the OSHA rule was indeed the last best shot of Biden at significantly lifting the vaccination rate. However, the court intentionally tried to tie up president Biden in doing what he needed to do. Several large businesses that previously placed vaccination or regular testing requirements revealed they had no plans to reverse course. Instead, smaller companies and businesses expressed a sigh of relief after the court’s verdict because they feared workers shortages if the OSHA rule allowed to enforce.

The Service Employees International Union called on states and Congress to pass laws requiring COVID-19 vaccinations, face masks, and paid sick leave. Likewise, workers need to better less to protective equipment and testing. The recent debate over inoculation mandates comes as a record number of American nationals face hospitalizations amid the Omicron variant. The nation averages approximately eight hundred thousand new virus cases and seventeen hundred deaths per day. In addition, countrywide, hospitals are suffering chronic health care staffing shortages.

Read Also: Florida Sued Biden Government Over Contractor Vaccine Mandate

The post President Reorganizes after Court Loss on Vaccine Mandate appeared first on LivenewsNow.

Buckingham Palace stated that after the allegations of sexual assault on the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, his royal patronages and military titles have been returned to the Queen. A royal source said that Andrew would also stop using His Royal Highness in an official capacity. It comes as the prince faces a United States civil action over sexual abuse accusations. On the other hand, Andrew consistently denied those claims.

Buckingham Palace announced that the military titles and royal patronages to the Duke of York had been returned to the Queen. He will also stop using the style of His Royal Highness as he is accused of sexual abuse. pic.twitter.com/nZuef0aIXS

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 14, 2022

A source familiar with the matter said that the Duke of York would continue to defend himself against the sexual assault case brought in New York. Virginia Giuffre submitted the claim against the prince. But the source insisted that the Wednesday ruling of the judge that the civil action could proceed was not a ruling on the merits of the allegations. Moreover, Buckingham Palace stated that with the approval and agreement of the Queen, they reversed the Royal patronages and military affiliations of the Duke of York.

Will Andrew retain his title HRH?

Andrew will now defend this case as a private citizen and continue not to commence any public duties. All his roles returned to Queen and will reallocate to other Royal Family members with immediate effect. According to the source, the Royal Family widely discussed the matter. Like Prince Harry and Meghan, Andrew retains his title HRH but will not use it officially.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defense expressed that it had no remarks about the return of the military titles of Duke to the Queen because it was a matter of the Palace. The royal roles and military titles will go to other Royal members, which means that all these roles and titles will not come back to Andrew whatever the outcome of his case. So, there are no open doors for him to return to public life. However, the Place confirmed that Andrew would retain his service rank of Vice-Admiral.

Read Also: Why did Prince Harry leave Royal Life and move away from London?

The post Prince Andrew Loses his Royal Patronages Over Sexual Abuse Allegations appeared first on LivenewsNow.

The United States halted the Biden government’s major push to boost the Coronavirus vaccination rate of the country. The recently blocked mandates compulsive workers at large businesses to get a vaccine shot or face weekly testing and wear a face mask on the job. Simultaneously, the Court allows the government to proceed with a vaccine mandate for most health care workers in the United States.

In addition, the Thursday court’s order came during a spike in COVID-19 cases amid the highly contagious Omicron variant. As a result, the conservative majority of the Court concluded the federal government breached its authority by seeking to impose the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA)’s vaccine or test rule on the affected. The regulatory agency projected that the rule would save sixty-five hundred lives and prevent two hundred fifty-thousand hospitalizations over six months.

The U.S. Supreme Court blocked a significant push by the Biden government to boost the countrywide Coronavirus vaccination rate, the requirement at large businesses to get a vaccine shot or face testing regularly on a weekly basis or wear a face mask on the job. pic.twitter.com/QGlxxcFwON

— Live News Now (@LiveNewsNow6) January 14, 2022

Moreover, the conservatives wrote an unspecified opinion that OSHA never enforced such a mandate or a Congress. Although Congress imposed enacted significant legislation tackling the Coronavirus pandemic, it rejected to endorse any measure similar to what OSHA proclaimed here. On the other hand, three liberals of the Court argued that the Court was deceiving by substituting its ruling for that of health experts.

The Court Displaces the Rulings of the Governmental Officials

Without legal basis and acting beyond its competency, the U.S. Supreme Court blocks the judgment of the Administration officials given the responsibility to respond to workplace health agencies, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, and Elena Kagan wrote in a joint dissent. Joe Biden, the President of the United States, expressed his disappointment with the Supreme Court decision to block common-sense life-saving mandates for employees at large businesses that grounded straight in both law and science.

The president requested businesses to introduce their own vaccination requirements, noting that a 3rd of Fortune’s hundred companies had previously done the same. When creating the OSHA rule, White House officials always predicted legal challenges – and privately, some believed doubts that it could withstand them. However, the government still views the rule as a success at already pushing millions of individuals to take vaccination shots and urging private businesses to execute their requirements that are unchanged by the legal challenge.

The Republican-led States Challenged both Mandate Rules

A federal appeals court in New Orleans initially blocked the OSHA regulation. Afterward, a national appellate panel in Cincinnati allowed it to take effect. GOP-led states challenged both rules. Additionally, business groups attacked the emergency regulation of OSHA as too expensive and possibly caused workers to leave their jobs at a time when getting new employees already is problematic. The largest retail trade group of the United States, the National Retail Federation, called the verdict of the Supreme Court a significant victory for employers.

The vaccine directive covers all health care workers virtually in the United States, applying to providers that receive Medicated or federal Medicare funding. Furthermore, it affects 10.4 million employees at seventy-six thousand health care facilities in addition to home health care providers. However, the rule has religious and medical exemptions. Justice Clarence Thomas documented in dissent that the mandate case was regarding whether the government has the mandate to force healthcare workers, by forcing their employers, to go through a medical procedure they don’t want and can’t reverse.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), around 62.7 percent of the population, over two hundred and eight million Americans, received full vaccination doses. Likewise, all nine judges received their booster doses. Moreover, the courthouse remains closed to the public, and security officials asked reporters and lawyers for negative Coronavirus test results before entering the courtroom. Last week, the judges heard arguments on the challenges. The questions of the justices were then implicit at the split verdict that they issued Thursday.

Read Also: Biden Government Defends its Authority on Vaccine Policies

The post US Supreme Court Blocks Federal COVID Vaccine Mandate for Businesses appeared first on LivenewsNow.