Please turn JavaScript on
For Better Science icon

For Better Science

Following For Better Science's news feed is very easy. Subscribe using the "follow" button on the top right and if you want to, choose the updates by topic or tag.

We will deliver them to your inbox, your phone, or you can use follow.it like your own online RSS reader. You can unsubscribe whenever you want with one click.

Keep up to date with For Better Science!

For Better Science: For Better Science – By Leonid Schneider, on research integrity, biomedical ethics and academic publishing

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0.31 / day

Message History

Schneider Shorts of 9.10.2026 - EU Commission invests €10 Million into Portuguese fraud, a French masterclass in replying on PubPeer, retractions for UCL professors retained and sacked, plus American quality science and amazing discoveries in Alzheimer's!

Read full story
"Bob Roskamp, a Sarasota entrepreneur and philanthropist, was getting his biggest kick Thursday from his $5-million gamble on a team of driven University of South Florida researchers who believe they can find the world's first treatment for Alzheimer's."

Read full story
Schneider Shorts 2.10.2026 - Greek papermiller and industry shill also worked for cocaine mafia, another papermill acquitted by Norwegian authorities, US biotech finds fraud, French entrepreneur on a losing streak, plus other retractions for trachea tranplanters, a trio of European professors, and a Commander of the British Empire.

Read full story
"Hongji Yan presented four different versions of Figure 9 in the article and during the investigation as the “correct” figure. One version was published in the original article, one version was sent to the journal and published as a correction, and two more versions were shared with the Board"

Read full story
"research misconduct can occur at any stage of the research process and that there is no requirement for the results or the findings of the research to have been affected. Furthermore, the incorrect images constitute precisely those research results which the authors themselves considered important enough to be presented in scientific articles." - NPOF

Read full story