Please turn JavaScript on
Early Retirement Extreme Forums icon

Early Retirement Extreme Forums

follow.it gives you an easy way to subscribe to Early Retirement Extreme Forums's news feed! Click on Follow below and we deliver the updates you want via email, phone or you can read them here on the website on your own news page.

You can also unsubscribe anytime painlessly. You can even combine feeds from Early Retirement Extreme Forums with other site's feeds!

Title: Just a moment...

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  30.5 / day

Message History

I thought people in my life would be like, wow, you're birding your way towards the renaissance ideal of becoming competent in a wide range of fields. That's facetious, but I did think people would be like, wow, you're doing something really challenging, good luck, work hard, get after it. It's kind of backfired so far. My family was alright with what I'd been up to previously, ...

Read full story
For example that you picked a "Polyanna"-graph out of a JPM presentation that explicitly contrasted and compared the Cassandra and the Polyanna perspectives.Thanks for your reply. The report defines Cassandra and Polyanna as follows:
Polyanna only focuses on what’s working in the energy transition while Cassandra only focuses on what isn’t, with both excluding facts or figu...

Read full story
The starting graph in this thread was from JP Morgan Bank. I find these are truthful and misleading at the same time. What kind of context would you like added to graphs?For example that you picked a "Polyanna"-graph out of a JPM presentation that explicitly contrasted and compared the Cassandra and the Polyanna perspectives.

Most casual readers are definitely not awa...

Read full story
Thanks @w7 that's interesting. Single with no kids op from 13% to 29% over 60 years... big change! That does make the household energy graph look somewhat misleading.
This thread illustrates the risk of posting graphs without context.A typical graph is carefully crafted to support an opinion. I assume most people will be aware of that. The book on

Read full story
Also, on top of that there are more households now than there were 40 years ago. Between 1980 and 2025 the US population has increased from 230M to 345M. That's 50% more people.

This thread illustrates the risk of posting graphs without context. If insight stops at the "I saw one graph"-level, it's possible to pick a graph of "number go up" to send one message (energy...

Read full story