Please turn JavaScript on
Doom Debates icon

Doom Debates

Subscribe in seconds and receive Doom Debates's news feed updates in your inbox, on your phone or even read them from your own news page here on follow.it.

You can select the updates using tags or topics and you can add as many websites to your feed as you like.

And the service is entirely free!

Follow Doom Debates: Doom Debates

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0.3 / day

Message History

What happens when AI passes our tests faster than we create new ones? Adam Khoja and Richard Ren helped build Humanity’s Last Exam. They return to explain what the disappearing benchmarks tell us about the future, and why smarter AI doesn’t automatically mean safer AI.


Adam Khoja and Richard Ren are research engineers at the Center for AI Safety (CAIS).


<...

Read full story

NYT bestselling author Robert Wright and I are kicking off a new experiment, a Nonzero × Doom Debates collaboration to react to big AI news and help you make sense of it.

This week we discuss the epic AI vibe shift that was catalyzed by an Anthropic employee’s resignation—and the big AI stories that paved the way for it.

Timestamps

0:00 A bo...


Read full story

Richard Ren is a research engineer at the Center for AI Safety who graduated summa cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania. His new paper on AI wellbeing makes the bold claim that today’s AIs have measurable, human-like feelings, which the paper calls “functional wellbeing.” They act happy when they succeed and sad when they’re berated.

We cover how you measure a ...


Read full story

Adam Khoja is a top AI forecaster who led the 2023 Center for AI Safety statement that shattered the Overton window on AI extinction risk. We cover his background, Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM), his new paper on AI betrayal, and whether Yudkowsky’s theoretical alignment research was a dead end.

Then Adam makes the case that an international AI slowdown is within ...


Read full story

Sam Altman keeps insisting that AI progress is going better than the doomers predicted and that even superintelligence may not change the world as radically as people think. I react to his latest interview and explain why I think that calm, reassuring framing badly downplays the danger we're actually in.

I go through the interview line by line: Sam's "frame control", hi...


Read full story