Please turn JavaScript on
header-image

Cozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer

Click on the "Follow" button below and you'll get the latest news from Cozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer via email, mobile or you can read them on your personal news page on this site.

You can unsubscribe anytime you want easily.

You can also choose the topics or keywords that you're interested in, so you receive only what you want.

Cozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer title: Cozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer | Covering state and federal first-party property insurance decisions, laws, regulations, and developments effecting the insurance industry.

Is this your feed? Claim it!

Publisher:  Unclaimed!
Message frequency:  0 / week

Message History

In Stella Property Development and Event Production, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 2026 WL 221489 (W.D. Pa. 2026), the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied summary judgment as to the applicability of the subject property policy’s (i) wear and tear and (ii) inadequate maintenance exclusions, holding that those issues wer...


Read full story

In Century Surety Co. v. EC & SM Guerra, LLC, 5:23-CV-01215-XR-RBF, 2025 WL 2602288 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2025) aff’2025 WL 2598375 (Sept. 5, 2025), the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas reaffirmed the magistrate’s report and recommendation holding that because the insured received a policy with its requested limits, Century did not bre...


Read full story

Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal recently clarified the enforceability of the “residence-premises” requirement in homeowners’ insurance policies. In Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Boniface Jean, the appellate court reversed a jury verdict in favor of the homeowner, holding that coverage cannot be created by waiver when the insured doe...


Read full story

In Cannon Falls Area Schools v. Hanover American Insurance Company (2025 WL 2976533 (D. Minn. 2025)), the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota held that a property insurer properly denied coverage pursuant to a cosmetic damage exclusion because hail indentations to roofs affected only their appearance, not their ability to function as barriers a...


Read full story